With the first round of GOP Presidential debates behind us,
and in the shadow of the Iran Nuclear
Image courtesy of msn.com |
For me, the word “debate” is just fancy-speak for
“argument”. Debaters are people who purport to be knowledgeable on a subject that present
opposing viewpoints. The main difference is debates are planned, moderated, and usually conducted with rules or conditions. Arguments are not nearly as
formal, and can break out pretty much anytime. Still, it comes down to two or
more people with opposing positions, trying to state their case effectively, so
as to sway the other side, or the audience.
Negotiations are not much different either. Two or more
sides come together with the hopes of reaching an agreement, or common ground,
to establish an outcome. In the process, the parties argue (or debate) their
positions to reach an agreement satisfactory to them. Early in my adjusting
career I was taught the definition of a negotiated agreement was one in which “all
parties are satisfied, but none are happy”. In other words, everyone gives up
more than they wanted to, but they get enough to make the agreement, or take
the deal. I was also taught that there were proven techniques and strategies
that could be employed when negotiating. Once of my first supervisors strongly
recommended I buy a book called “You Can Negotiate Anything” by Herb Cohen.
This was over 25 years ago, but I still remember it, and it gave me a
foundation for thinking differently about negotiating. And it didn’t just apply
to insurance, as the title implies. It applied to just about anything.
As we saw in the presidential debates, even parties on the
same “side” can disagree substantially, and
Image courtesy of commons.wikimedia.com |
But back to insurance. With insurance, you can’t negotiate
when you enter an agreement to pay an insurance company to insure your property
(or your life or health, for that matter). And remember, insurance – while
often described as a “product” – is actually a legally binding contractual
relationship. But with one major difference than most other contracts you enter
into. When you agree to contract for insurance, you have no say in the wording
of the policy. It is a unilateral contract – the insurance company writes the
policy/contract, and you either accept it or you don’t. For the most part, this
is not a good thing, with one main exception. Typically, if there is a dispute
regarding the language of the policy, courts will generally rule in favor of
the party that did not have a
say in writing the contract.
Now, while you might not have a say in how the policy
contract is written, you do
have a say in what you get paid should you have a claim (shhhh, don’t let the
insurance company know – they are under the impression that they get to tell
you what they are going to pay, and you just have to accept it).
Why do they
think this way? Because in nearly all cases, insureds accept whatever the
insurance company offers them. After all, who usually knows more about insurance
and estimating damages, the insurance company or the insured? Who sends out a
professional, licensed insurance adjuster, well versed in what they will and
will not pay for? Who follows this process up with a letter on official
letterhead that includes language from the actual insurance policy? Who has
consultants, engineers, and attorneys at the ready, and depending on the
insurance industry for their very livelihood? And who handles tens of thousands
of claims each and every year, the insurance company or the insured? Of course,
the insurance company has a huge advantage throughout the process.
But that does not mean you can’t negotiate an
insurance claim, or renegotiate a previous insurance
Image courtesy of en.wikipedia.org |
This may be confusing because on the one hand I said
negotiating is simply arguing or debating your position to reach an agreement.
But remember, to do this effectively,
you have to be knowledgeable on the subject, and in the case of insurance
claims, the subject can be obscure, unfamiliar, technical, and if you’ve ever
read an insurance policy cover to cover, quite convoluted. This is why
professional public adjusters tend to fare much better at negotiating insurance
claim settlements with company adjusters. We are familiar with policy language,
construction, basic engineering, construction codes and standards, and while we
are not lawyers, we are trained on applicable rules, laws, and legal
cases. We also spend each day immersed in the process of adjusting and
negotiating claim settlements. For the most part, we know what the insurance company
adjusters know (sometimes more), putting us on a level playing field, which is
a tremendous advantage when it comes to negotiating any agreement.
What are some other ways to gain advantage in an insurance
claim negotiation? There are many, but
Image courtesy of en.wikipedia.org |
Don’t negotiate with yourself. Typically, this means you
don’t make the first offer, and you don’t make two consecutive offers in a row.
But once the insurance company has presented their offer, don’t expect them to
make another offer simply because you rejected the first (they know that
trick).
Stay in the real world. Don’t exaggerate figures or make
unreasonable demands, just because you believe their figure or offer is
unreasonably low. Take the time to really listen to the other side. Show them
that you are considering their position, and not dismissing them. Reiterate
their points back to them, letting them know you heard them, before replying
with your counter-points. Then, see if you can find areas of common ground.
Ask to speak to someone higher up the chain of command. The
further up you can go while making reasonable arguments, the better your
chances they will contact their subordinates and ask them to resolve this so
you won’t keep calling them. Obviously, they expect this, and will resist, but
you can persist and respectfully insist. If the claim supervisor won’t talk to
you, ask for the claim manager, or the vice president of claims, or the owner
of the insurance company. It will not always work, but it does work.
When negotiating directly with someone, don’t feel compelled
to fill moments of silence. For some
Image courtesy of en.wikipedia.org |
Don’t go into the negotiation with concrete expectations of
absolute victory. Imagine the worst outcome, and consider the lowest amount you
would accept. Then ask yourself,” if they offer me one single penny less, would
I walk away?” If the answer is “no”, you need to reconsider the lowest amount
you would accept, and then ask yourself that same question again and again
until you are certain you would walk away without a deal. That’s your bottom
line.
Fill out the form below for your Free copy. |
Never begin your negotiations with your bottom line, and
don’t be afraid to state a higher figure is your bottom line, even if it isn’t.
Using this card too often will damage your credibility.
Finally, assume the other party knows these tactics and
strategies as well (and maybe more). Negotiation is like a dance – dress well,
learn the steps, perform with confidence, and you should be fine. And when all
else fails, hire a professional.
Mark Goldwich is president of Gold Star Adjusters, a group of public insurance adjusters dedicated to helping citizens get the maximum settlement for any insurance claim.
This was interesting and informative. It's nice to know that there are some options for an insurance customer and going to a knowledgeable Public Adjuster is one of them.
ReplyDeleteUnless you're in the industry, hiring a professional really may be the way to go. I find the ins and outs of insurance and claims to be pretty complicated.
ReplyDeletetrue, but I would add that even people in the industry could benefit. I have been hired by claims adjusters and even insurance agents in the past.
ReplyDeleteI had no idea you could negotiate with insurance companies! Thanks for the great info!
ReplyDeleteThe secret to winning a debate is staying power. The reason that the insurance companies win most debates is they have an army of adjusters, lawyers and lobbyists whose job it is to wear down policy makers and policy holders. That's why you need someone on your side before you go toe to toe with them.
ReplyDelete